Architecture due diligence
Review code, interfaces, deployment and technical risks against maintainability and roadmap needs.
Review code, interfaces, deployment and technical risks against maintainability and roadmap needs. This engagement addresses a system change, acquisition or investment depends on an unclear software estate Scope centers on an evidence-linked findings report, risk register and remediation path and defines systems, markets, review points and acceptance evidence before delivery begins.
Allwing will confirm scope, timing, responsibilities and fees in a written proposal before work begins.
What this work addresses
A system change, acquisition or investment depends on an unclear software estate. The engagement clarifies the relevant current state before committing to implementation.
Business outcomes
- Reduce friction and uncertainty where a system change, acquisition or investment depends on an unclear software estate.
- Give product owners, founders and engineering leaders a reviewable basis for the next decision through an evidence-linked findings report, risk register and remediation path
Scope of work
- A system change, acquisition or investment depends on an unclear software estate.
- Review code, interfaces, deployment and technical risks against maintainability and roadmap needs.
- An evidence-linked findings report, risk register and remediation path
- Agreed review points, acceptance evidence and change control recorded in the engagement scope.
Deliverables
- An evidence-linked findings report, risk register and remediation path.
- A closeout record covering assumptions, owners, acceptance status and recommended next steps.
Who this serves
- Product owners, founders and engineering leaders
- Founders and startup teams
Client responsibilities
- Name a decision-maker and a day-to-day contact for the engagement.
- Provide accurate source material and authorized access required for the agreed scope.
- Confirm client-owned decisions, approvals and feedback within the dates set in the project plan.
- Confirm access, constraints and approvers relevant to architecture due diligence during discovery.
Clear stages. Visible decisions.
Stages are tailored to the agreed scope. Reviews and acceptance criteria are recorded in the proposal and delivery plan.
- 01 / Frame
Align on business context, decision owner, constraints, systems and success signals.
Client inputs · Current workflows and relevant documentation · Named sponsor and decision makers
Outputs · Engagement brief · Scope boundaries, assumptions and decision log
- 02 / Discover
Research users, operations, market, data and technical conditions before prescribing a solution.
Client inputs · Subject-matter access · Existing data and timely feedback
Outputs · Current-state findings · Prioritized requirements, baseline and dependencies
- 03 / Design
Translate findings into an approved service, product, campaign or operating design.
Client inputs · Review participation · Named approvers
Outputs · Concept or solution design · Implementation plan and acceptance criteria
- 04 / Deliver
Build, produce, configure or launch in sequenced increments with review gates.
Client inputs · Approved access and content · Client decisions and agreed tools
Outputs · Reviewed work product · Quality checks, release notes and handover
- 05 / Improve
Review adoption and agreed signals, then prioritize maintenance or the next iteration.
Client inputs · Operational owner · Access to agreed performance data
Outputs · Readout and recommendations · Knowledge transfer and optional follow-on plan